The historic Ram Mandir Pran Pratishtha ceremony in Ayodhya on January 22, 2024, is a momentous occasion for millions of Hindus in India. In anticipation of this significant event, several courts and tribunals across the country have declared a half-day holiday. Additionally, bar associations have made requests to relevant authorities and judges, urging them to refrain from passing any adverse orders in cases where lawyers are absent due to the celebrations.
Rationale for Half-Day Holiday:
High Significance: The Ram Mandir Pran Pratishtha holds immense religious and cultural significance for many Indians. It marks the culmination of a long and complex historical journey, and attending the ceremony or participating in celebrations is a matter of great importance for many individuals.
Reduced Attendance: A significant portion of lawyers and court staff are expected to be absent from work due to their desire to participate in the celebrations. This could lead to logistical challenges and potential delays in proceedings.
Public Participation: Granting a half-day holiday recognizes the widespread public interest in the event and allows individuals to participate in festivities without compromising their professional responsibilities.
Bar Associations’ Request:
Avoidance of Prejudice: In view of the high number of expected absences, bar associations have petitioned judges and judicial authorities to exercise discretion when dealing with cases scheduled for January 22.
No Adverse Orders: The associations specifically request that no adverse orders or judgments be passed in cases where the concerned lawyer is absent due to their participation in the Ram Mandir Pran Pratishtha celebrations. This could include deferring the hearing, extending deadlines, or allowing representation by another lawyer.
Fairness and Understanding: The plea recognizes the unique circumstances surrounding this event and seeks to ensure that no party suffers prejudice due to their desire to celebrate a historic occasion.
Potential Concerns:
Disruption of Justice: Some might argue that granting a half-day holiday or delaying proceedings could disrupt the smooth functioning of the judicial system.
Unequal Application: Concerns might arise regarding potential inconsistencies in the application of the holiday or the request to avoid adverse orders across different courts and regions.
Setting Precedent: Granting leniency in this specific case might set a precedent for future requests based on religious or cultural events, potentially leading to disruptions in the judicial calendar.
Balancing Considerations:
While ensuring the efficient functioning of the judiciary is crucial, recognizing the significance of the Ram Mandir Pran Pratishtha for a large section of the population is also important. A balanced approach that respects the right to celebrate while minimizing disruption might involve:
Clear Communication: Courts and bar associations should communicate the holiday schedule and the request regarding orders well in advance to ensure awareness and preparation from all parties.
Case-by-Case Assessment: Judges can utilize their discretion to assess individual cases and determine the most appropriate course of action, considering the specific circumstances and potential prejudice.
Alternative Arrangements: Courts can explore alternative arrangements like virtual hearings or rescheduling cases to prevent unnecessary delays and ensure access to justice.
The Ram Mandir Pran Pratishtha is a landmark event for millions of Indians. Acknowledging its significance while maintaining the smooth functioning of the judicial system requires a balanced and flexible approach that prioritizes both individual rights and the efficient administration of justice.
